Sun Jul 24 17:19:07 1994


Visible impact sites; Current listing; Thanks to all

The length of the following message is not intended to set a precedent, but as several people have asked about the present visible evolution of the impact sites, here is an update, plus a note of thanks to you all.

(1) LATEST VISUAL OBSERVATIONS, July 22 and 23.
(Longitudes are tabulated below.)

July 22 (20h-22h):
James Lancashire (JAL) and Paul Doherty (PD), both using 30-cm
telescopes.
Site C: Still present after 5 days without substantial fading.
Site K/U/W: The overall appearance has not changed much since July 20
but it now contains 3 (JAL) or 4 (PD) dark nuclei.
Site L: Still large and dark.

July 23 (19.30-21.30):
John Rogers, 30-cm refractor. The appearance is just amazing - the
planet really has been thoroughly carpet-bombed.
Site L: Still large and dark after 4 days, broken into several
components.
Site D/G/S: Large and complex, perhaps the most impressive yet seen.
As it approached the p. limb, there was a bright spot on the limb Np.
it.
Site R: A tiny black spot south of the main line of dark spots, close
to D/G/S with a tiny bright spot between. (R and Q1 were identified
from the longitudes given by the Hubble team; see below).
Site Q1: A single black spot like a satellite shadow. Cannot see site
N.
Site H: Remarkable changes now it is 5 days old. It is a very dark
spot, obviously north of the main line, but may have a black Sf. tip
which would be on the line. Also, there was a light area f. it when
coming in from the f. limb, and a bright spot p. it when on the disk.

In general, the large spots have remained prominent for up to 5 days, but are distorting, as if stratospheric currents are carrying the 'smoke' to E. or N. or S.

There are several indications that light material may be spreading through the region. We have to beware of visual contrast effects but what I see are:

Given the small size of sites R and Q1 (and the difficulty of disentangling S and W from previous sites), it appears possible that the comet had 3 classes of sub-nuclei: (i) those displaced tailward, whose impacts were not detectable (or barely so); (ii) the early 'on-line' nuclei, which produced prolonged fireballs and large scars, in proportion to their brightness in the comet; (iii) these later on-line nuclei, which produced briefer fireballs and smaller scars.


(2) PRESENT LIST OF VISIBLE SCARS

----------------------------------------------------
Site	\3            \3           \2          Date		
      (HST)        (vis)         (vis)
----  -----     -----------   ------------  -------
A     185           178           107       July 19** (faint)
C     224           219           148       July 19**
K/W    -        263-278-283   191-206-211   July 22** (JAL) 
L      -        (mid.342)      (mid.270)    July 22 (lo-res; JAL)
                330-348-352   260-277-281   July 20**
D/G/S  25 (G)   (6)-28-31   (293)-315-318   July 23**
R      42           40.5          328       July 23
Q1     64           67            355       July 23
H     101           97             25       July 23
F?     -            -
E     154          155             83       July 19**

----------------------------------------------------

The second column gives the System III longitudes reported by the Hubble team (as of July 23, presumably from early images). The third and fourth columns give our most recent longitudes, in Systems III and II, from visual obs'ns on the dates given (p.m.). These are by myself except for those marked JAL. Where one value is given, the scar looked like a satellite shadow (except for A); where three are given, they are the p. end, the black core, and the f. end. Values in brackets are approximate.

We have not looked at sites E, A, C since July 19; possible update tonight but the weather is about to break...
**These were reported by Maria Womack et al. at the Lowell Obs. to be still bright in 890-nm images on July 21 (a.m.).
As before, our longitudes tend to be slightly lower than Hubble's even for the 'black spots', presumably because they measure the very darkest point which is near the f. edge.
In general, the scars get bigger and/or darker after the first passage, and so far only site A has faded (after 3 days). Sites C and H have been observed for the longest without further disturbance, and are still prominent after 5 days. However, the shapes change over several days.
I do not know of any visual sightings of scars for the 'dud' impacts, viz.:
B; F (though it is consistently reported in the infrared); P2; Q2; U (went into K/W); T (went into E/F); V (went into E/F); nor for the small impact, N (close to Q1).
The Hubble team today report that the Q2 and N sites "are so small that they are difficult to detect in our images". The exploder has carried single reports of sites T (Wm.Herschel Tel.), P2 and U (Table Mtn.Obs.), detected on the disk in infrared, but were they distinct from the complex structure developing in previous sites?

****************************************************

(3) THANKYOU BUT NOT GOODBYE

As the dust begins to settle, I really want to say thankyou to everyone who has been involved in disseminating the information about this event. Thanks particularly to Paul Chodas and Don Yeomans for producing all those predictions; to Anne Raugh and Lucy McFadden for operating this exploder service; to Glenn Orton for the International Jupiter Watch (Atmospheres) bulletins prior to the impacts; to anyone else involved whose role I have overlooked; and to EVERYONE who has sent messages about your observations and ideas. Your messages are being summarised as quickly as possible for circulars to amateur astronomers, who will certainly carry on observing. This has been the most exciting (and sleep-deprived) week that I can remember.

It has really been impressive how much everyone has achieved. The press and public must be impressed too: that astronomers can get spectacular predictions right (for once!); that observatories and spacecraft have performed so well (especially Hubble S.T.); and that astronomers worked together so well, and got such splendid data and images out so quickly. The public image of science must have got a real boost from this.

Regarding the visual spectacle, I concur with Clark Chapman that the big impact scars are the most prominent transient spots ever seen on Jupiter, and are easy for anyone with an 8-cm telescope or bigger. ('Transient' excludes the GRS which, we must admit, was stunning around 1880 if not 1990.) Certainly, as Tom Hockey's list shows, such a thing has never happened before in recorded history. (I can say so having reviewed all historical observations as part of the work for my comprehensive book, 'The Giant Planet Jupiter', which is being published by CUP in spring, 1995 - excuse me for slipping that in...)

The show is not over; amateurs will track these scars as long as possible (and keep an eye open for meteors on the limb). I'll be happy to send periodic reports through the exploder - and to receive updates from everyone else - for as long as Anne and Lucy think it's worth operating. Best wishes:

John Rogers (British Astronomical Association).
****************************************************



Last Modification: 94/08/01 15:00 MET
Curator: C. Kronberg (smil@agleia.de)